Sticks and Bones

  • Our critic's rating:
    Date:
    November 1, 2014
    Review by:
    Stanford Friedman

    Review by Stanford Friedman
    19 November 2014

    The hours do not go flying by in The New Group’s revival of David Rabe’s brutal satire, Sticks and Bones. Vietnam haunts this play and, like the war itself, the scenes bleed out slowly, demanding our attention. This is a strong production of a very dated show. When it premiered at the Public Theater in 1971, the country was mired in the war. The shootings at Kent State were an open wound and the Pentagon Papers had just been published. In New York City, the murder rate was three times what it is today, a financial crisis was looming, and Frank Serpico exposed widespread corruption within the city police department. The comparatively comfy audience of 2014, taking their seats after hearing a little mellow jazz in the lobby of the Pershing Square Signature Center, has no rage in need of release and the resulting lack of connection with the material is palpable.

    Sticks is surely a war story, but not just about Vietnam. Rabe, like the other up and comers of his time, such as Edward Albee and Sam Shepard, were seeking absurdist ways to explore morality and the domestic human condition and, being white males, they were much concerned about what exactly it meant to be one. Thus, when young David (Ben Schnetzer), returns home to a seemingly idyllic household after being blinded in battle, he screams in terror at what would otherwise be comforting. His parents, Ozzie (Bill Pullman) and Harriet (Holly Hunter), seem on the surface to be as happy a couple as the TV family they are named after, and kid brother Rick (Raviv Ullman), when not snacking on fudge, strums his guitar, carefree. But the horrors of home prove just as traumatic as the battlefield when we see that David would gladly do away with a father who finds no purpose in life, and a mother loyally devoted to religion and housekeeping. Even seemingly pure Rick, it turns out, spends his nights in sin. David’s blindness operates on multiple levels. He is blind to color, haven fallen for a “yellow woman” overseas. He is the classically Shakespearean blind man who sees things all too well. And he echoes Sophocles’ Oedipus in his hatred for his father and a disturbing violation of his mother.

    Pullman is excellent. His Ozzie is always one beat away from going mental. Placid conversations with his son seamlessly become racist, vitriolic confrontations. Numerous, deeply explored monologues express his confusion at what it means to be a man and a father. He never grows comfortable with his living room chair, that traditional seat of power. Late in the show, as he heads out the door to get away for a while, Rick asks if he’s going out and Ozzie responds. “Looks like it.” Pullman ingeniously spins the line in a way suggesting that his leaving is totally beyond his control. It is a vocally demanding role and, a month into the run, there is some strain in the actor’s voice giving him a pleasingly raspy tone, reminiscent of Eli Wallach, that works to his advantage. Holly Hunter is a trickier case. Her best performances are usually the ones where her characters are self-involved, allowing the actress to work within her own quirky bubble (See The Piano, or more recently her insane turn in Top of The Lake). Here, she is called upon to be a caretaker of an exploding family and though she goes about it with a workmanlike precision, both her comic scenes and her attempts at loving interaction seem less than fully realized. Ullman, meanwhile nearly steals the show with his hilarious performance. Under the sage direction of Scott Elliott, his Rick pulls a perfectly tuned turn of character right at moment when it can cause the most damage. And Richard Chamberlain shows up in the classic helpless-priest role. No stranger to portraying a man of the cloth, and looking and sounding 30 years younger than the man of 80 he is, he provides the perfect cameo role for a production staged as a fractured sit-com, with a family much in need of a blessing.

    (Stanford Friedman)

    "In Scott Elliott’s fascinating new production, any professional discomfort felt by him and his cast, led by Holly Hunter and a brilliant Bill Pullman, feeds the climate of anxiety in which 'Sticks and Bones' must exist."
    Ben Brantley for New York Times

    "Hunter is particularly fascinating as a seemingly model mother who can’t conceal that she’s as agitated as a shaken Pepsi bottle. That’s something - but not quite enough to make the nearly three-hour show satisfying."
    Joe Dziemianowicz for New York Daily News

    "Bill Pullman and Holly Hunter are so intense, so scarily good in 'Sticks and Bones' that at times it’s painful to watch them — but it’s impossible to forget them."
    Elisabeth Vincentelli for New York Post

    "It doesn't have quite the same dramatic punch, due more to flaws in the play than the passage of time. Several superb performances, though, make it extremely watchable, even as you wince at all the pain on the stage."
    Robert Feldberg for The Record

    "Although 'Sticks and Bones' does not speak effectively to our troubled era, The New Group’s revival at least provides an authentic echo of rage from times gone by."
    Michael Sommers for New Jersey Newsroom

    "Rabe writes with the fervor of someone burned by his experience as a soldier but perhaps even more so by the incomprehension that greeted returning Vietnam vets from all sides in the early '70s. If the play is dated and somewhat distancing in its unsubtle approach, the emotion behind it remains intense."
    David Rooney for Hollywood Reporter

    "Shocking in its day, the play still packs a mighty emotional wallop."
    Marilyn Stasio for Variety

    External links to full reviews from popular press...

    New York Times - New York Daily News - New York Post - The Record - New Jersey Newsroom - Hollywood Reporter - Variety